← Search

Dana Gerken

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lexington, KY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 48W–45L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history93 matches
L
2026-09-14 · KY/LEX/Albrecht/Walker · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patti Stanton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-18 · KY/LEX/Albrecht/Walker · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patti Stanton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-15 · KY/LEX/Walker/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Hume
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-29 · KY/LEX/Walker/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Hume
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-22 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns/Albrecht · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte Nickerson
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-04 · KY/LEX/Howard/Queen · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Albrecht
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · KY/LEX/Walker/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Kennoy
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-23 · KY/LEX/Walker/Johns/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Wilcox
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-03-15 · KY/LEX/Albrecht · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Halle Hewitt
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · Camp Crystal Ace · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Sarah Back
loading the estimate
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-03-12 · Camp Crystal Ace · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Monica King
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.9% of games
3.0
60.5%
23W–15L · 55.8% of games
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.1% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.4% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.2% of games
5.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova