← Search

Ronald Waddell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Crozet, VA
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
17 matches · 2W–15L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history17 matches
W
2025-07-15 · GATA18/MARTIN1/4.0 - 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mike Lewis
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-06-26 · GATA18/MARTIN1/4.0 - 3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nid Baldwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-05 · GATA18/MARTIN1/4.0 - 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nid Baldwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2024-09-06 · Forest Lakes-Sanford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynette Sanford mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-25 · Forest Lakes-Sanford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Wall mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-08-18 · Forest Lakes-Sanford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judy Roy mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2024-08-09 · Forest Lakes-Sanford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judy Roy mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-04 · Forest Lakes-Sanford · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynette Sanford mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-16 · Forest Lakes Mid-Court Crisis-Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noel Jorgensen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-09 · Forest Lakes Mid-Court Crisis-Jorgensen · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allison Ewing mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-19 · ACAC Breaking Bad-Bayliss · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melissa Zeller mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-03-24 · ACAC Breaking Bad-Bayliss · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jan Carroll mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 33.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 29.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
1 match
#3 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova