← Search

Nigel Perks

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lafayette, LA
3.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
24 matches · 16W–8L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history24 matches
W
2026-10-13 · Dickens/18/5.5M/Combo/BVR · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cullen Curry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-29 · Dickens/18/5.5M/Combo/BVR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cullen Curry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-22 · Dickens/18/5.5M/Combo/BVR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cullen Curry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-09-12 · Bolles/18/Div II M/Tri/Reds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Hong championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-11 · Bolles/18/Div II M/Tri/Reds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grant Smith championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-01 · Dickens/18/5.5M/Combo/BVR · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Cullen Curry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-06 · Bolles/18/Div II M/Tri/Reds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Hong
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Bolles/18/Div II M/Tri/Reds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grant Smith
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grant Smith championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
60%
9W–6L · 54.2% of games
5.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#2 Singles
13%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova