← Search

Alexey Rasskazov

Parkland, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 123W–99L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Alexey Rasskazov to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Parkland/Ma · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with James Baseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · Parkland/Ma · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mauricio Camacho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-20 · Parkland/Alexey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Grant DEPENBROCK
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · Parkland/Alexey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jose Loo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · Parkland/Ma · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donny Ma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Broward/Goetz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalia Frantsevskaya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · Parkland/Alexey · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Egor Frantsevskiy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · Parkland/Ma · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mauricio Camacho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · Broward/Goetz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriela Alvarez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Debra Reed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Debra Reed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-17 · Parkland/Danini · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jack Danini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
65.6%
40W–21L · 56.4% of games
3.5
23.7%
9W–29L · 37.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 40.2% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 59.8% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
32W–16L · 59% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
60.7%
17W–11L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
77 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
64 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova