← Search

Phillip Ramil

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Derwood, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 144W–59L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history203 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Copsey · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christian Boyer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-09-29 · Thongphok - Aces & Aches · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anto Faini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-19 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Mennealy championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Anzures championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew DaRosso championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Mennealy championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Pratt - Great Sets · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cece Finan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · Mennealy - Scramblerz 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Montgomery
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Mennealy - Scramblerz 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Mennealy
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-22 · Pratt - Great Sets · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cece Finan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · Ramil - SomeMoCopsey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with J Nathan
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-11 · Ramil - SomeMoCopsey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Montgomery
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.5
80.8%
21W–5L · 62.2% of games
4.0
74%
37W–13L · 59.5% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.5% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 46.9% of games
3.5mixed
100%
7W–0L · 65.9% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 66% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
68.7%
46W–21L · 55.8% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 58.6% of games
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
55 matches
#1 Singles
8%
16 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer