← Search

Rod Bustamante

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Cumming, GA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 99W–26L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2025. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history125 matches
W
2026-10-25 · Fowler Park (Rod Bustamante)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ricardo Rodriguez
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Akhilesh Singh Thakur championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Akhilesh Singh Thakur championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aravindhu Chenna championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Akhilesh Singh Thakur championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-22 · Fowler Park (Rod Bustamante)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ricardo Rodriguez
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-10-04 · Fowler Park (Rod Bustamante)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Laidman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 6-7
L
David Kochanski / Jeff Redden
2026-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Rhodes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dale Lineberry championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Rhodes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Rhodes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Rhodes championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
93.3%
14W–1L · 70.5% of games
3.5
88%
22W–3L · 69.2% of games
4.0
70.5%
43W–18L · 56.4% of games
7.5
76.9%
10W–3L · 62.6% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 46% of the time
#1 Singles
46%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
12%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams