← Search

Craig Weiss

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 16W–19L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history35 matches
L
2026-10-17 · LA - GC Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Schlesinger
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · LA LLWx GC Ball Busters 55+ - Bob Shames · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Schlesinger
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · LA LLWx GC Ball Busters 55+ - Bob Shames · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Schlesinger
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · LA - GC Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raymond Bertrand
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-07 · LA - GC Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Schlesinger
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · LA - GC Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gianni Pulli
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · LA LLW GC Ball Busters - Bob Shames · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Winn
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · LA LLW GC Ball Busters - Bob Shames · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Winn
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-10-18 · LA - GC Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Hoenighausen
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-08-09 · LA LLW GC Ball Busters - Bob Shames · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Morris Ruskin
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
Peter Lizotte / Stephen Plum
2025-08-03 · LA LLW GC Ball Busters - Bob Shames · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Schlesinger
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-08-11 · LA - Griffin Club Ball Busters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Garrigan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
40%
8W–12L · 48.5% of games
7.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams