← Search

Matt Essman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chesterfield, MO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 109W–41L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history150 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Kraft-Essman (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Brunnquell
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-18 · Kraft-Essman (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-20 · Kraft-Essman (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-15 · Kraft-Essman (F) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-16 · Super Balls (Hardebeck) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-07-14 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-5
W
2026-07-07 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Kinnaman
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · Super Balls (Hardebeck) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Harold Nottingham
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · Super Balls (Hardebeck) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laurie Graves mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · Tulloch/Albrecht · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Kinnaman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 60.2% of games
3.0
73.8%
31W–11L · 61.9% of games
3.5
82%
41W–9L · 62% of games
4.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 52% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 73.5% of games
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
33 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert