← Search

Elizabeth Peaslee

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 47W–63L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Team 22 Samuell Grand/Josephakis-Peaslee W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Hilliard
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-10-11 · Team 14 LB Houston/Schneiderman-Kim W4.0S · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-27 · Team 14 LB Houston/Schneiderman-Kim W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Krystofik
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-20 · Team 14 LB Houston/Schneiderman-Kim W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Bennett
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-18 · Team 22 Samuell Grand/Josephakis-Peaslee W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Niki Leete
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-11 · Team 22 Samuell Grand/Josephakis-Peaslee W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Niki Leete
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · Samuell Grand/Josephakis-Peaslee W3.5T · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · LB Houston/Schneiderman-Kim W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · Samuell Grand/Josephakis-Peaslee W3.5T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Arlene Kirkland
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · LB Houston/Schneiderman-Kim W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Monschke
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Samuell Grand/Josephakis-Peaslee W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · LB Houston/Schneiderman-Kim W4.0S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Croley
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 57.9% of games
3.5
41.3%
31W–44L · 45% of games
4.0
0%
0W–12L · 26.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
13%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer