← Search

Connie Brown

— year-end
54 matches · 23W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Connie Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-09-09 · MPanek-HR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandra Herring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · BMcGarrah-HR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abigail Hatcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · MPanek-HR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen Fitts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · BMcGarrah-HR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joyce Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · AHabib-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with James Bowers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-15 · AHabib-HR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashraf Habib mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · AHabib-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Reo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · CMurray-HR · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · AHabib-HR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Reo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-16 · KCabelka-HR · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · KTravis-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barbie McGarrah
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
Katie Sanders
2026-06-09 · KCabelka-HR · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 42.4% of games
3.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.2% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.8% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Singles
13%
7 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer