← Search

Paul Jackson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tonka Bay, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 73W–53L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history126 matches
W
Default
2026-06-28 · Goodwin: Net Assets Summer 2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Larsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-19 · Ostlund 8.0 40+ S26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanna Poinar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · Goodwin: Net Assets Summer 2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Holtz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-22 · Ostlund 8.0 40+ S26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah Tuel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · Ostlund/Tuplano TBC 40+ 4.0 S26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Timothy Edmund
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · Goodwin: Net Assets Summer 2026 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yuko Goodwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · Goodwin: Net Assets Summer 2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Yuko Goodwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-14 · Ostlund/Tuplano TBC 40+ 4.0 S26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bhavin Trivedi
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-07 · Ostlund/Tuplano TBC 40+ 4.0 S26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Swanson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · Bartz/Lund Mixed One Doubles · #1 Mixed Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Lund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · Goodwin: Net Assets 2026 Winter · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Holtz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-05 · Ostlund/Tuplano TBC 40+ 4.0 W26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Colburn
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
84.8%
28W–5L · 63.7% of games
4.0
36.4%
16W–28L · 46.5% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 51.3% of games
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer