← Search

Amanda Middlebrook

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Shreveport, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 41W–63L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history104 matches
W
2026-09-30 · Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laquita Briggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-09-28 · Middlebrook/18/5.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hunter Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-23 · Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laquita Briggs
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-21 · Middlebrook/18/5.5/CWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hunter Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-16 · Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Fraser
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-09 · Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Crafts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Spano
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Crafts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Crafts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · Middlebrook/18/5.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hunter Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-12 · Middlebrook-Rickert/40/6.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elizabeth Crafts
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · Middlebrook/18/5.5/CWN/POTC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Hunter Martin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
48.6%
17W–18L · 49.7% of games
3.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 41.9% of games
5.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 43.8% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 46.9% of games
2.5mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.7% of games
3.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal