← Search

Stephen Chabot

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Gorham, ME
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
9 matches · 2W–7L · seasons 2022–2023
Match history9 matches
L
2023-05-20 · Apex:StraightSets:Straetz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Straetz
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-06 · Apex:StraightSets:Straetz · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-04-29 · Apex:StraightSets:Straetz · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-06 · RFC:TBD:Talbot/Kryger · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Talbot mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-03-06 · RFC:TBD:Talbot/Kryger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Talbot mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2022-02-06 · RFC:TBD:Talbot/Kryger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Talbot mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2022-02-06 · RFC:TBD:Talbot/Kryger · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Talbot mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-01-23 · RFC:TBD:Talbot/Kryger · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Elwell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2022-01-09 · RFC:TBD:Talbot/Kryger · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Elwell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
2 matches
#1 Singles
11%
1 match
#2 Singles
11%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal