← Search

Jessica Dye

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Brentwood, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 87W–41L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history128 matches
L
2026-09-30 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Lamphron
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-16 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tiffini Lindsay championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-13 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon McWaters championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-12 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Lamphron championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-09-09 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Bentley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Olson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christie Harrison
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hope Cummiskey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · McWaters/Vestevich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon McWaters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-20 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon McWaters championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shalini Rose championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
Default
2026-07-10 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leah Lamphron
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
84.6%
22W–4L · 66.1% of games
3.5
70.5%
31W–13L · 56.4% of games
4.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 50.6% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5
90%
9W–1L · 73% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 50% of games
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.5% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
26 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert