Search

Beth Pegram

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 77W–59L · seasons 20222026

Captains: add Beth Pegram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
2026-09-01 · St.Styers18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · St.Suski40S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-20 · Th.Critcher40C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Laura Olson
2026-08-18 · St.Styers18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Ki.Meeker18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-29 · Be.Pegram18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-22 · Be.Pegram18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Laura Olson
2026-07-15 · Be.Pegram18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
Sarah Powers / Austin Reesemixed
2026-07-12 · Lo.Elliott18M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cam Barker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-02 · Ki.Meeker18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · Be.Pegram18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Garnier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · Be.Pegram18S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
56.5%
26W–20L · 53.9% of games
3.0
47.2%
25W–28L · 51.5% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.7% of games
5.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 61% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 80% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert