← Search

MJ Nejad

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Encino, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 25W–37L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history62 matches
W
2026-06-29 · Aged to Perfection/Perryman/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanah Greenspan
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-19 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamra Loeb
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
Default
2026-06-08 · Aged to Perfection/Perryman/MHCC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Koenig
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-05 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Joan
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-29 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Joan
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-17 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-03-06 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-27 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-06 · Braemar Vixens/Nagler-Parent/MHCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Truhett
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
39.1%
18W–28L · 45% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe