← Search

James Herbert

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Purcellville, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 133W–40L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history173 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Kearney - LGCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with JJ Herbert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-13 · Cebulash - Who Is We? Flipper Grillers · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-09 · Kearney - LGCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with JJ Herbert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-10-06 · Cebulash - Who Is We? Flipper Grillers · #3 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-28 · Ly - WIW Attackers LRC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy TAYLOR mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-26 · Ly - WIW Attackers LRC · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy TAYLOR mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-25 · Ly - WIW Attackers LRC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsey Frye mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-25 · Ly - WIW Attackers LRC · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy TAYLOR mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · Team 3 Net Dominators Rabbit Grillers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Kalfus
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-2
W
2026-08-29 · Cebulash - Who Is We? Stringing Winners · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vijeaswaran Velusamy
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · Ly - WIW Attackers LRC · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lindsey Frye mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · Cebulash - Who Is We? Stringing Winners · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Saunders
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
83.8%
31W–6L · 65.9% of games
4.0
81.6%
40W–9L · 63.5% of games
4.5
50%
3W–3L · 55.1% of games
7.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 61.7% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
14W–7L · 58.3% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
70.4%
19W–8L · 58.8% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
18 matches
#1 Singles
10%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe