← Search

Matt Warticki

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clearwater, FL
3.5M year-end 2023
i
Mixed Exclusive — this player’s rating comes only from mixed play
25 matches · 14W–11L · seasons 2022–2024
Match history25 matches
L
2024-06-16 · SPCC Hagman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-02 · SPCC Hagman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Gardiner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-05-05 · SPCC Hagman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Gardiner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-02-11 · SPCC Drinking Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Silvie Bahulova mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-01-28 · SPCC Drinking Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie McKeon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
L
2024-01-14 · SPCC Drinking Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Silva mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2023-10-15 · SPCC Drinking Team · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Krystal Gardiner mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2023-09-24 · SPCC Drinking Team · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allison Matheny mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2023-06-04 · SPCC Hagman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-05-14 · SPCC Hagman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2023-04-23 · SPCC Hagman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lina Chaves mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2023-01-29 · SPCC Hagman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Silvie Bahulova mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2022–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0mixed
56%
14W–11L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 52% of the time
#2 Doubles
52%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
48%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe