← Search

Anna Markum

Corvallis, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 27W–20L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Anna Markum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Ranee McDougal championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Ranee McDougal championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Amanda Degelsmith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · TTC-Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Van Khieu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-25 · TTC-Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Hoelscher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · TTC-Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Van Khieu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-24 · TTC-Hamilton · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Szabo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · SOR-TTC-McGowan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Victoria Wolff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · SOR-TTC-McGowan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Degelsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-18 · SOR-TTC-McGowan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Degelsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · SOR-TTC-McGowan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Degelsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-03-15 · SOR-TTC-McGowan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Degelsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 53.6% of games
3.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.6% of games
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
11 matches
#1 Singles
17%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert