← Search

Miriam Mick

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SPARTANBURG, SC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 4W–13L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history17 matches
L
2025-06-24 · SATL40M/McFatridge/McMillian Park · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Ventura mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-17 · SATL40M/McFatridge/McMillian Park · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcus Zollinger mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-26 · SATL65/NGoodroe/YMCA · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Groves
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-12 · SATL65/NGoodroe/YMCA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan J Vollmer
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-29 · SATL65/NGoodroe/YMCA · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Groves
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
W
2023-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Barbara Davenport
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-08-28 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Karen Scott
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rebecca McGowan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2022-08-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Siegel
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2022-08-22 · FTA18/Riverside/Campbell · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Barbara Davenport
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-08-15 · FTA18/Riverside/Campbell · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kathy Campbell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2022-08-08 · FTA18/Riverside/Campbell · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Christina Pompey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 34.8% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.9% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 31.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova