← Search

Martha Gagnon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chicopee, MA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 32W–23L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history55 matches
L
2026-05-03 · ETC:Orange Slice:O'Leary/Paige · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Noonan
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · ETC:This is us: Besse/Gagnon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Meg Lenihan Hutcheson
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-11 · ETC:Orange Slice:O'Leary/Paige · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Noonan
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-12-07 · ETC:This is us: Besse/Gagnon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelly Warren
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-3, 0-1
W
2025-11-09 · ETC:Orange Slice:O'Leary/Paige · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Noonan
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-2
W
2025-10-19 · ETC:Orange Slice:O'Leary/Paige · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Noonan
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-07-12 · ETC: This is Us: Besse/Gagnon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Shelly Warren
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-3
W
2025-06-08 · ETC: This is Us: Besse/Gagnon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Corsetti
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-03-30 · ETC: Orange Slice:Bone · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beverly Paige
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 2-6
L
2025-03-22 · ETC: Net Nuts:LaPierre · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Armand Wray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 0-5
W
2025-03-01 · ETC: Net Nuts:LaPierre · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Armand Wray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-02-15 · ETC: This is Us: Besse/Gagnon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Adler
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 64.7% of games
3.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.2% of games
6.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.1% of games
6.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert