← Search

John Schaller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Barrington, RI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 7W–17L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history24 matches
L
2026-07-21 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Christian
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Christian
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Greenaway
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Cabezas
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-24 · B CC: Three-Five Swingers/Wescott/Cabezas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Lubelczyk
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-5, 3-5
W
Default
2026-06-23 · CC: The Crushers/Savickas/Lopes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mussab Aljarrah
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-19 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Christian
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Christian
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-13 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dave Harrington
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-3
W
2026-06-11 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Savickas
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · B CC: Three-Five Swingers/Wescott/Cabezas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Clark Wescott
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-23 · CC: Artificial Wintelligence/Schaller/Savickas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Berg
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 43.2% of games
4.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova