← Search

Ramin Lamei

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alpharetta, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
7 matches · 4W–3L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history7 matches
W
2025-07-13 · White Columns (Michael O'Brien)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seth Pesek
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-07-06 · White Columns (Michael O'Brien)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seth Pesek
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-29 · White Columns (Michael O'Brien)* · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Seth Pesek
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 6-4
W
2024-10-06 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tanya Lamei mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tanya Lamei mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tanya Lamei mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
Tyler Usnik / Shelby Usnik
2022-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tanya Lamei mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
43%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer