← Search

David Jensen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 23W–31L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history54 matches
L
2026-08-09 · EM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joy Jensen mixed
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · EM ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Wink mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · EM ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joy Jensen mixed
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · EM ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Liz May mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · EM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joy Jensen mixed
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-05 · EM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joy Jensen mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-24 · EM RED · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joy Jensen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-23 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joy Jensen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-10 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joy Jensen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-07-02 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joy Jensen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-25 · EM RED · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joy Jensen mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-07-15 · EM NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darren Malia
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
56%
14W–11L · 52.6% of games
6.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 48% of games
6.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King