← Search

Kate Laffey Lobdell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Youngstown, PA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 4W–12L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history16 matches
L
2026-07-30 · Net Chix · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Polsinelli
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-12 · Net Chix · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Ramsay
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-22 · Net Chix · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carole McKain
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-13 · Net Chix · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Naidu
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Ramsay
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Albright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-08-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Polsinelli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Polsinelli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Jackson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Albright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Buczek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Nancy Miller / Rose Lepore
2024-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Buczek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 33.9% of games
7.0
25%
3W–9L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 69% of the time
#3 Doubles
69%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova