Search

Will Bayon

Beaverton, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
73 matches · 51W–22L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
6%
stay 3.0
94%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 44% stay · 56% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.13 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 3.0
6 of 47
OR · 3.0
47 of 600

Will is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams17 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Will has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Will has gone from the 68th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
77.8%
28W–8L · 63.8% of games
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.8% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-07-25 · We do it for Johnny · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Danowski
+0.055better than expected — took 60% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Michael Weeks / Philip Ourso
2026-07-19 · Just Here for the Beer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Skip Potter
+0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · Just Here for the Beer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Dickinson
+0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · We do it for Johnny · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Chiong
+0.029better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-06 · We do it for Johnny · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jun Erroba
+0.009about as expected — took 33% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Philip Ourso / Michael Weeks
2026-06-24 · Just Here for the Beer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jason Floyd
+0.006better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Hao Lee / Scott Fish
2026-06-18 · Just Here for the Beer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Skip Potter
0.016about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Alex Blank / Andrew Jacobs
2026-05-09 · WHRC-Dickinson/Floyd · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ian Schnadig
0.026below expectation — took 47% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Mike DiFabio
2026-05-03 · WHRC-Dickinson/Floyd · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.001better than expected — took 75% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · WHRC-Dickinson/Floyd · #3 Doubles · with Ian Schnadig
0.009about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
JUN KYU PARK / Jinman Jun
2026-04-04 · WHRC-Dickinson/Floyd · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Dickinson
0.019about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Bj Park / Ned Cannon
2026-03-21 · N OR-WHRC-Dickinson · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rodrigo Reyes
+0.032better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-0, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.