← Search

Bradley Cherney

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pooler, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 68W–29L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history97 matches
W
2026-10-31 · SQCC - Cherney/Durrence · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-10-29 · SQCC - Eberle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-24 · SQCC - Cherney/Durrence · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-22 · SQCC - Eberle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-18 · SQCC - Belli · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Miller
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-17 · SQCC - Cherney/Durrence · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Stewart
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-15 · SQCC - Eberle · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Stewart
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-09-26 · SQCC - Cherney/Durrence · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-24 · SQCC - Eberle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Jacobs
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-09-20 · SQCC - Belli · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Miller
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-19 · SQCC - Cherney/Durrence · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Stewart
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-17 · SQCC - Eberle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Butch Durrence
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
79.7%
59W–15L · 65.5% of games
4.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.8% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 57.9% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer