← Search

Deanna Murchison

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Winter Haven, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 36W–18L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history54 matches
W
Katie Petersen
2026-10-27 · Beerman/Escowitz · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-06 · Beerman/Escowitz · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Hannah Taylor
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Beerman/Escowitz · #2 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Nikki Hoagland
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-22 · POLK/Adult18&over3.0 W/Beerman - N. Escowitz · #2 Singles · 3.0 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Beerman Family/ M. Savant · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Burns
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-05-27 · Beerman Family/ M. Savant · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dena Linthicum
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · Beerman Family/ M. Savant · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-12 · Beerman Family/ Escowitz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Taylor
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-05-07 · POLK/Mason · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Rutherford
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · Beerman Family/ Escowitz · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Default
2026-04-22 · Beerman Family/ M. Savant · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Shoemaker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-21 · Beerman Family/ Escowitz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Chevalier
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.2% of games
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 70.5% of games
3.0
68%
17W–8L · 56.1% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.7% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 62.7% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#2 Singles
13%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe