Search

Joe Steilen

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
84 matches · 44W–40L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
6%
stay 3.0
94%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 45% stay · 55% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.12 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.0
4 of 17
WA · 3.0
79 of 755

Joe is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joe has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Joe has gone from the 34th to the 97th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.1% of games
3.5
29%
9W–22L · 43.8% of games
6.0
100%
6W–0L · 81.1% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 57.6% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
L
Andy Wang / Simon Swifterchamps
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Troy Johnson
0.033below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
arvind Mallikarjunan / Sai Muppachamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Troy Johnson
+0.018better than expected — took 54% of games against 47% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Yuzhou Wu / Yu Wang
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Johnson
0.014about as expected — took 68% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Georgy Gorelko / Justin Hu
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Sbarbaro
0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 70% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Sourabh Mittal / Yizhang Tao
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shane Coulter
+0.006better than expected — took 86% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Ramon Calpe / Stephen Mock
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shane Coulter
0.020below expectation — took 59% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Phi Hoang / Jason Nguyen
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Sbarbaro
0.040below expectation — took 63% of games against 73% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Johnson
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Varun Nagpal / Sundar Ganesh Natarajan
2026-04-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Johnson
0.043below expectation — took 56% of games against 70% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Grahm Satterwhite / MIke Woodchamps
2026-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Vijay Gosalia
+0.018better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Hyoung Jun Ahn / Michael Bee
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Young
+0.009about as expected — took 52% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Peter Mason / Scott Kenley
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Coffey
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.