← Search

Cecilia Fagan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
110 matches · 39W–71L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history110 matches
L
2026-11-01 · HV-Washington 3.0W Fall Singles F3 · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · with Karen Healy
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-17 · #1 Doubles · with Stephanie Arnold
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-17 · #1 Doubles · with Anne Schott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-10-10 · #2 Doubles · with Anne Schott
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-10-09 · HV-Washington 3.0W Fall Singles F3 · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-31 · HV-Chien 5.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Adam Dawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-18 · HV-Chien 5.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rafael Chavez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · AAREC-LaPointe 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann LaPointe championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-15 · AAREC-LaPointe 18s 3.0 NW F6 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonalee Shah championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · HV-Chien 5.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Adam Dawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · RCAA-Kumagai 55s 6.0 NW F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Heben
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 46.4% of games
3.0
27.3%
9W–24L · 42.5% of games
5.0
50%
5W–5L · 44.7% of games
5.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 43.9% of games
6.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.4% of games
5.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#3 Singles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert