← Search

Nancy Snook

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bloomington, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 23W–40L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history63 matches
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Rebholz
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peggy Caslow
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Erwin
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-29 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Hall
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darla Bruder-Goodlick
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-08 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Caslow
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-01 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Caslow
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-02 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Tobiasz championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-23 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dixie Raines
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-09 · MSIL A55&O 6.0W Burr/Magers-Bloomington · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dixie Raines
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-19 · MSIL A18&O 3.5W McHenry-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Tretter
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-16 · MSIL A40&O 3.5W Rebholz/Dickerson-Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Caslow
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 85.7% of games
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 40.9% of games
6.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.3% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.9% of games
6.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.4% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova