← Search

John LaRochelle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Murrells Inlet, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 10W–22L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history32 matches
L
2026-04-09 · GSTL55/Johnson/Wachesaw · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Martin
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-25 · GSTL55/Johnson/Wachesaw · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with GREG WAYBRIGHT
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · GSTL55/Johnson/Wachesaw · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Martin
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
Default
2026-02-11 · GSTL55/Johnson/Wachesaw · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Mullican
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-04-16 · GSTL55/Walsh/Wachesaw · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Walsh
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-04-09 · GSTL55/Walsh/Wachesaw · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Mullican
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-26 · GSTL55/Walsh/Wachesaw · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with GREG WAYBRIGHT
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-03-05 · GSTL55/Walsh/Wachesaw · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Adamson
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-02-12 · GSTL55/Walsh/Wachesaw · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Adamson
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-02-05 · GSTL55/Walsh/Wachesaw · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Mullican
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-06-12 · GSTL18/Johnston/Wachesaw · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Walsh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2024-06-05 · GSTL18/Johnston/Wachesaw · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Walsh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 43.7% of games
3.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#1 Singles
6%
2 matches
#3 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert