← Search

Lindsay Ivory

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Dallas, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 14W–32L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history46 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Team 9 Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Vonbargen
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-16 · Team 32 Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0F · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Robertson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-25 · Team 32 Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Madison Dahl
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-18 · Team 32 Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tara Edge
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Sun
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-06 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alana Gilhang
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-07 · Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Robertson
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-01 · Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0T · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Sun
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-06 · Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Fitzgibbons
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-01 · Samuell Grand/Leete W3.5S · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Robertson
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0F · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Osborne
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-13 · Lakewood/Osborne-Ivory W3.0F · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angie Robertson
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 60% of games
3.0
28.6%
10W–25L · 42.5% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 34.1% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert