← Search

Emily Schmidt

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 125W–37L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history162 matches
L
2026-11-01 · KY/LOU/WALKER/WALLITSCH · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Maddox
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-31 · KY/LOU/SCHMIDT/WALLITSCH · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Willis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-25 · KY/LOU/SCHMIDT/WALLITSCH · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Berry
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsie Williams championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shaheen Khan championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-10-23 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelsie Williams championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-22 · KY/LOU/SCHMIDT/WALLITSCH · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-13 · KY/LOU/WALKER/WALLITSCH · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Willis
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · KY/LOU/SCHMIDT/WALLITSCH · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Willis
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-10-04 · KY/LOU/BERRY/WALLITSCH · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Theresa Alexander
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-03 · KY/LOU/OCONNELL/JACKSON · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Abby Schuhmann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-21 · KY/LOU/BERRY/WALLITSCH · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Remy Lamphere
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
2.5
89.5%
17W–2L · 74.2% of games
3.0
85.2%
23W–4L · 68.8% of games
3.5
73.5%
25W–9L · 59.5% of games
4.0
44%
11W–14L · 48.4% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.3% of games
5.5
80%
8W–2L · 67.3% of games
6.5
100%
8W–0L · 69.4% of games
7.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 57.3% of games
8.5
80%
4W–1L · 57.9% of games
3.0mixed
100%
6W–0L · 76.3% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.5% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
26 matches
#1 Singles
13%
21 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer