← Search

David Seah

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Stamford, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 78W–51L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history129 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Westchester Avenue Tennis: Racket Spinners · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Nask mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-25 · SOL:Fine Wine:Woolwine/Fine · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Fine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · SOL:Fine Wine:Woolwine/Fine · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Barban mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-23 · NC:Nat'l Lords of the Strings:Friese · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Mikulecky championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · NC:Nat'l Lords of the Strings:Friese · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Mikulecky championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-11 · NC: Lord of the Strings: Friese/Seah · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chen Liang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · NC: Lord of the Strings: Friese/Seah · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Mikulecky
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · NC: Lord of the Strings: Friese/Seah · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Hawkins
loading the estimate
5-6
W
2026-05-23 · NC: Lord of the Strings: Friese/Seah · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Mikulecky
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-6
L
2026-05-17 · CP: Mixed 40 : Raman/Pandali" · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elana Gershon mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · CP: Mixed 40 : Raman/Pandali" · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elana Gershon mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · NC: Lord of the Strings: Friese/Seah · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Mikulecky
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 69.4% of games
3.5
70.3%
26W–11L · 57.5% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.8% of games
6.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
63.9%
23W–13L · 56.9% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams