← Search

Cindy Karam

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
El Paso, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 78W–52L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history130 matches
L
2026-10-31 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Isaac
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-17 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Porras
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-27 · GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Baeza#1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
loading the estimate
8-9
L
2026-09-27 · GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Baeza#1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Medina
loading the estimate
6-8
L
2026-09-27 · GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Baeza#1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luisa Fernanda Gomez Baca
loading the estimate
4-8
W
2026-09-26 · GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Baeza#1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paulina Caraveo
loading the estimate
9-7
W
2026-09-12 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Porras
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-15 · GEPTA/18&overMX/4.0/Harris/EPCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dante Garcia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · GEPTA/18&overMX/4.0/Harris/EPCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nico Tejeda mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · GEPTA/18&overMX/4.0/Harris/EPCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Inzer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-22 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Genevieve Pendergras
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-06 · GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashleigh Barreno
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 60.1% of games
3.5
70.7%
29W–12L · 57.9% of games
4.0
48.3%
14W–15L · 48.5% of games
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 39.4% of games
7.0mixed
55.2%
16W–13L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer