← Search

Judith Ortiz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mission Hills, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 66W–56L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history122 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Sets in the City/Bramstedt-SanMiguel/Fremont · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Varughese
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-11 · Sets in the City/Bramstedt-SanMiguel/Fremont · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Dershewitz
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-12 · Sets in the City/Bramstedt-SanMiguel/Fremont · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine O'Neal
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-05 · Sets in the City/Bramstedt-San Miguel/Burbank · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · Sets in the City/Bramstedt-San Miguel/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine O'Neal
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · Sets in the City/Bramstedt-San Miguel/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Olivia Varughese
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-02 · Sets in the City/Bramstedt-San Miguel/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Letty King
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Sets in the City/Bramstedt-San Miguel/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Juli Dershewitz
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · 3.0 Racketeers Singles/Ortiz-Bramstedt/Fremont · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · Racketeers Mixed 7.0/Jung-Angrisani/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Jung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-28 · 3.0 Racketeers Singles/Ortiz-Bramstedt/Fremont · #3 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-22 · Racketeers Mixed 7.0/Jung-Angrisani/Burbank · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Jung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 56% of games
3.0
54.9%
39W–32L · 51.6% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.9% of games
2.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 48.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#3 Singles
12%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova