← Search

Christina Veal

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Natick, MA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 6W–15L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history21 matches
W
2026-04-17 · LFNT:Longfellow:Spetter/Lanza · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony Ip mixed
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-06 · LFNT:Longfellow:Spetter/Lanza · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tony Ip mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-04-18 · LFNT:Natick:Spetter/Lanza · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Larry Meiselman mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-21 · LFNT:Natick:Spetter/Lanza · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Raja Bobbili mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 5-6
L
2025-01-10 · LFNT:Natick:Spetter/Lanza · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Mathias mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-12 · LFW:Wayland Long Shots:Ackerley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chia Hsin Chen
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-4
L
2024-06-10 · W109:Wimbledon:Spetter/O'Brien · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Mcintyre
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-05 · LFW:Wayland Long Shots:Ackerley · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-1
L
2024-05-22 · LFW:Wayland Long Shots:Ackerley · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-20 · W109:Wimbledon:Spetter/O'Brien · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-17 · W109:Wimbledon Warriors:Spetter · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Chamblain mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2024-04-12 · W109:Wimbledon Warriors:Spetter · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Steven Blum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 35.2% of games
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#2 Singles
29%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
3 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer