← Search

Brittany Schuhmacher

Park City, UT
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 42W–12L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Brittany Schuhmacher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-08-01 · Park City MARC-Krueger/Siano · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-07-28 · Park City MARC-Krueger/Siano · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · Park City MARC-Krueger/Siano · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
N/A
2026-05-26 · PC MARC-Krueger/Siano · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-12 · PC MARC-Krueger/Siano · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-04-28 · PC MARC-Krueger/Siano · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Tilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-04-24 · Park City MARC-Smith/Byington · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Christina Marshall / Patti Miner
2023-12-08 · Park City MARC-Krueger/Byrne · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2023-11-15 · Park City MARC-Krueger/Byrne · #1 Female Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-10-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2023-09-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hauser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
9W–3L · 70.2% of games
3.0
83.9%
26W–5L · 64.9% of games
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 70.1% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Singles
13%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova