← Search

Shana Kligerman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Palm Harbor, FL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 10W–1L · seasons 2022–2025
Match history11 matches
W
2024-11-12 · Innisbrook · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Elise Hall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-10 · Innisbrook · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Micki Arnold
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-02-25 · Innisbrook Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Aliak
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-02-09 · Innisbrook Smith · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Skillman
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-02-03 · Innisbrook Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Ornot
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-01-13 · Innisbrook Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Aliak
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
W
2022-08-25 · Innisbrook · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Heidi Pukas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2022-08-11 · Innisbrook · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Tobin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2022-08-06 · Innisbrook · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Tobin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-07-16 · Innisbrook · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Heidi Pukas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-07-09 · Innisbrook · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kim Tobin
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 62.8% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 82% of the time
#1 Doubles
82%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King