← Search

Luke Jordan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Anoka, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 59W–40L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history99 matches
L
2026-10-28 · Jordan/Sampson: Net Ninjas ES27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brett Eliason
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-10-27 · Magistad/Birkeland Fall 27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-21 · Jordan/Sampson: Net Ninjas ES27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Rietgraf
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-16 · Magistad/Birkeland Fall 27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-10-14 · Jordan/Sampson: Net Ninjas ES27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Rietgraf
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-07 · Jordan/Sampson: Net Ninjas ES27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Rietgraf
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-06 · Magistad/Birkeland Fall 27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-01 · Lau/Sampson: Net Ninjas · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Rietgraf
loading the estimate
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Magistad/Birkeland Summer 26 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
68.1%
47W–22L · 56.5% of games
4.5
42.1%
8W–11L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#2 Singles
16%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
15 matches
Singles
11%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert