← Search

Maria Reardon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Walpole, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 13W–7L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history20 matches
L
2026-09-25 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carey Higham championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carey Higham
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carey Higham
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-09 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Thompson
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-6
L
Rebecca Helme / Debi Seamans
2025-09-26 · W109:Wimbledon 109:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Thompson championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-07 · W109:Wimbledon 109:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 2-1
W
2025-07-17 · W109:Wimbledon 109:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Beggan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-3, 1-0
L
2025-07-10 · W109:Wimbledon 109:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2024-08-15 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan McCarty
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-08-07 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-25 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Haase
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2024-06-27 · W109:Wimbledon:Higham/Haase · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Thompson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 85% of the time
#3 Doubles
85%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer