← Search

David Ruark

Camas, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
132 matches · 38W–94L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 37 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
99%
stay 2.5
1%
up to 3.0

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
28 of 35

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been a steady 2.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.02.52023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, David has gone from the 9th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
30.3%
30W–69L · 41.9% of games
3.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 27.9% of games
2.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.6% of games
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history132 matches
L
Grant Criteser / Benjamin Kellogg
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hal Abrams
+0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Troy KonigWilcox / Jimmy Stillman
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hal Abrams
−0.017below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Nick Paxson / Quin Hoxie
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hal Abrams
−0.052below expectation — took 28% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Yong Hyeon Yi / Hyun Uk Chae
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hal Abrams
+0.003better than expected — took 67% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Jae Hur / Gihun Choe
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hal Abrams
−0.004about as expected — took 63% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Lap Hei Lam / Alexander La Cour
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hal Abrams
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Jeff Towle / Troy KonigWilcox
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carlos Rios Trevino
+0.009better than expected — took 53% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Shue
−0.026below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Michael Bacon / Todd Burch
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Hal Abrams
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Richard Nobleman / Miguel de la Rosa Gamboa
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Roberts
+0.007about as expected — took 32% of games against 34% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Aaron Geiger / Ben Hutchinson
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Scott Peck
+0.027better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Donghyup Ryu / Jinman Jun
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dan Shue
+0.035better than expected — took 38% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.