← Search

Daniel Brignac

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Benton, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 89W–54L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history143 matches
W
Default
2026-10-21 · Pipes/18/6.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cody Lenert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-14 · Pipes/18/6.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Bouillon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-10-13 · Pipes/18/6.5/CM/BTC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cody Lenert
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-01 · Ellis/40/7.5/CM/BTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Lowe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-30 · Pipes/40/6.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Coats
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-24 · Ellis/40/7.5/CM/BTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Courtney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-23 · Pipes/40/6.5/CM/BTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Coats
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-17 · Ellis/40/7.5/CM/BTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sean Deere
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-13 · Furqueron/40/3-3.5-4/MT/BTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Anderson championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-12 · Furqueron/40/3-3.5-4/MT/BTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Pipes championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-12 · Furqueron/40/3-3.5-4/MT/BTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Furqueron championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-09-11 · Furqueron/40/3-3.5-4/MT/BTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Pipes championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
75%
12W–4L · 58.1% of games
3.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 56.1% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 42.4% of games
5.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 61.8% of games
6.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 51.7% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 43% of games
3.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 61.4% of games
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.2% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
31 matches
Singles
11%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova