← Search

Shawn Grant

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tulsa, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 77W–51L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Townsend/PH/40&over3.0M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neil Hasty
loading the estimate
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-14 · Townsend/PH/40&over3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Hoffman
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-09-21 · Townsend/PH/40&over3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Townsend
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-17 · Townsend/PH/40&over3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Todd Hoffman
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-09-10 · Townsend/PH/40&over3.0M · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Townsend
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · Huntley/PH tri 4.0 M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Hawkins
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · Taylor 55s 6.0X/LF · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darla Knight mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-05 · Huntley/PH tri 4.0 M · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bryan Hawkins
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-24 · Taylor 55s 6.0X/LF · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Darla Knight mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Townsend championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Townsend championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Andrew Townsend championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
68.6%
35W–16L · 56.5% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 44% of games
6.0
75%
12W–4L · 63.2% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 56% of games
5.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
47.4%
18W–20L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
27 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams