← Search

Iris Xin

San Jose, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
135 matches · 99W–36L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.88
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
93%
stay 4.0
7%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.83. Lower than today’s 3.88 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
CA · 4.0
4 of 19

Iris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Iris has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Iris has gone from the 98th to the 71st percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 68% of games
3.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.1% of games
4.0
81%
34W–8L · 58.5% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 33% of games
5.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
13W–0L · 68.7% of games
7.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
61.1%
11W–7L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history135 matches
L
Shelley Meyermixedchamps
2026-06-28 · #1 Singles
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Mimi Fichter
2026-06-07 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.012better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Arwa Kaddoura
2026-05-31 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.067below expectation — took 25% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Deepthi Vishwanath
2026-05-31 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Deana Dyal
2026-05-30 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.027about as expected — took 33% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Emily Vainberg
2026-05-27 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.074below expectation — took 25% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Charlotte Fisher
2026-05-19 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.071better than expected — took 100% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Rachel Wright
2026-05-18 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.053better than expected — took 44% of games against 27% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Mira Khanna
2026-05-17 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.019better than expected — took 65% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Theresa Goodwin
2026-05-10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.041below expectation — took 56% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Caroline Tsoi
2026-05-08 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.073better than expected — took 92% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Haruko Kurata
2026-05-03 · #2 Singles · 4.5
+0.041better than expected — took 29% of games against 22% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.