← Search

Mark Katakowski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 75W–77L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history152 matches
L
2026-10-25 · #1 Doubles · with Adam Dawson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · with John-Paul Wolfe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-10-16 · #2 Doubles · with Bikramjeet Singh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-10-03 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Loh
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Frances Carlson mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-09-25 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Lammers mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-29 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elisabeth Berry mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · LIB-Dawson 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Qi Gao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBO · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carolyn Loh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · LIB-Barden 5.5 MIX COMBO · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carolyn Loh mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · LIB-Dawson 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Megan Kahn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Storey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 69.1% of games
3.0
41%
16W–23L · 48.8% of games
3.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 49.5% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.8% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.9% of games
6.5
50%
7W–7L · 46.7% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 62.1% of games
5.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63.2% of games
6.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.4% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
32 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert