← Search

Sarah Corbin

— year-end
17 matches · 8W–9L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Sarah Corbin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-05-13 · Cooper/18/Div1/WD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-15 · Cooper/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Logan Talbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-25 · Cooper/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · Cooper/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marguerite Istre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-11 · Cooper/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-09 · Cooper/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna Burnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-25 · Cooper/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Coenen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-11 · Cooper/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alicia Coenen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-04-16 · Pierce/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-03-19 · Pierce/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Ledet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2024-05-01 · Pierce/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-04-17 · Pierce/18/3.0/WD/BREC · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams8 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
8W–8L · 49.1% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova