← Search

Lisa Eberhart

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Contoocook, NH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 1W–25L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history26 matches
L
2026-06-18 · MTS:Joslin-King:Kunkel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Donahue
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · MTS:Joslin-King:Kunkel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Stevens
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-19 · YMCA:Kunkel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Moore
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-05 · YMCA:Kunkel · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tannye Wold
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-22 · YMCA:Kunkel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tannye Wold
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-16 · YMCA:Kunkel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Moore
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-02 · YMCA:Kunkel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Moore
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-05 · MTS:Joslin-King:Kunkel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Judith Pevear
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-4
L
2025-05-29 · MTS:Joslin-King:Kunkel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Padgett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-22 · MTS:Joslin-King:Kunkel · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Debra Moore
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-18 · MTS:Ininger:Lidbeck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marta Modigliani
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-28 · MTS:Ininger:Lidbeck · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cathleen Scharpf
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 30.5% of games
8.0
0%
0W–10L · 27.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 73% of the time
#3 Doubles
73%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer