Duc Duong
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Caledonia, MI
166 matches · 126W–40L · seasons 2022–2026
USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.
Match history166 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2023–2027
MVC Hewitt FWL A18-4.5M
MVH McFall A40-4.5M
PTC Arlen FWL A40-4.0M
PTC Duong FWL A18-4.0M
PTC Duong FWL M18-8.0X
PTC Duong FWL M40-8.0X
EAST-Kean 18s 4.0M F4
EAST-Kean 40s 4.0M F2
MVC VanderStoep FWL A18-4.5M
MVC VanderStoep WSL A18-4.5M
MVH McFall FWL A40-4.5M
MVH McFall WSL A40-4.5M
PTC Arlen FWL A40-4.0M
PTC Arlen WSL A40-4.0M
PTC Duong FWL A18-4.0M
PTC Duong SL T18-3.5/4.0/4.5M
PTC Duong WSL A18-4.0M
PTC Patrick FWL M18-8.0X
PTC Patrick WSL M18-8.0X
PTC Podgurski FWL M40-8.0X
PTC Podgurski WSL M40-8.0X
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
88.9%
16W–2L · 68% of games
4.0
74.6%
50W–17L · 58.9% of games
4.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 61.4% of games
7.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
67.5%
27W–13L · 54% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
39 matches
#1 Singles
11%
19 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.